Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 13:36:18 +1100 From: David Cheney <david.cheney@canonical.com> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd/pandaboard Spurious interrupt detected [0x000003ff] Message-ID: <CAHPQsERHkRfzeF7yV-sygXu_=e4yOmQBvPLYk4t4MhiMkKdmVQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1383532405.31172.137.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <CAHPQsESP2aQxYDj0J=BdDUDhQdWnxMuAJ5fPNELGqLPsR==Ktg@mail.gmail.com> <1383526716.31172.131.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAHPQsEQQ%2BZ29vZj%2BasoWB3mFPo-wU%2BJJ7LytGJ=q8BmPSozd_w@mail.gmail.com> <1383532405.31172.137.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 13:19 +1100, David Cheney wrote: >> Thanks Ian, try now. >> >> As a question to the group, I have the following hardware >> >> Pandaboard >> BeagleBone Black >> RPi >> >> And I am trying to bring up Freebsd/arm so I can get our Go builder >> working again[1]. Of these candidates, which is the one you would >> recommend ? >> >> Cheers >> >> Dave >> >> [1] build.golang.org > > The pandaboard is the fastest of those I think, but the Beaglebone may > be the best combo of speed and well-supported if these pandaboard > problems don't go away quickly for you. Thanks Ian. I got the BBB recently because it appeared to be the best supported, but it appears to be suffering from the issue of selecting a very low, ~550mhz clock speed no matter what source it is connected too, leading to build times for ports and go of many hours. > > -- Ian > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHPQsERHkRfzeF7yV-sygXu_=e4yOmQBvPLYk4t4MhiMkKdmVQ>