Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:30:51 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Chenchong Qin <qinchenchong@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Chenchong's work on net80211_ratectl Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokF6hPtg9FoEdeJXLLaZRNhzd=nr_o6nHE%2BjYiQKTg3zQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFnsE3d9nG-X2b=z1srKfTtpxC3w5L%2B6Hg3TbOnAQrJN%2Bt19GA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFnsE3dYdPf5yGTFH683Q1Zh0mc-g%2B_YtCTraNNt28z2vBoSKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmom4sY7jcNwWmJkrDwfWjsok2fk8UEwTi5A=egj1JyerLw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFnsE3cyg=msBfQqqKUMmLABSL=j24VoMBwbBjxQ6b7Dyy7Mqg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=k8NddAYyAJCkx4eOaA_8XsSxg6uKrdddx%2BgmeT%2BX9KA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFnsE3eaOyRcO3LXSi3L=jbzpyMv5Nt_jRGKt_mmA0WV-EV5vA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokdxLhK5x6kO=jJzk-dv61EDK-ZgmndOimoyWWf76HiZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonMjR5iVTMVN9532d%2BPqOXWNUoZvxPtQir5h=yGxU-XdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFnsE3d9nG-X2b=z1srKfTtpxC3w5L%2B6Hg3TbOnAQrJN%2Bt19GA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well just remember you can always ask me/us questions! What's your latest diff against -HEAD? Maybe I can start looking at including parts of it in the tree. -adrian On 2 August 2013 09:17, Chenchong Qin <qinchenchong@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > These days, I'm taking a further look at what Linux done for the > _completion_ of a > frame. Some updates will be posted here later. > > And, with ir_rates, we can return/fill an rc array rather than just > returning the rix. > > Thanks! > > Chenchong > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> Boo! >> >> Do you have another update? >> >> >> >> -adrian >> >> On 24 July 2013 06:44, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> > On 24 July 2013 06:38, Chenchong Qin <qinchenchong@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> My pleasure! >> >> >> >> It's also against HEAD. >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> > >> > Ok. This is looking great! >> > >> > Next - we need to update the rate control API to now populate an rc >> > array rather than just returning the rix. >> > >> > This is the tricky part - as we're going to have to modify all the >> > drivers that use the rate control API to use this. >> > Which is fine, as there's only a handful. It's just annoying. >> > >> > Then we have to provide the rate control information during frame >> > _completion_, so the rate control code knows which transmission rates >> > succeeded or failed. I'm still not sure what to do about it here. >> > Maybe do something like Linux and attach TX rate control and >> > completion information as an mbuf tag? >> > >> > _Then_ we can start doing interesting thing with it. :) >> > >> > >> > >> > -adrian > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokF6hPtg9FoEdeJXLLaZRNhzd=nr_o6nHE%2BjYiQKTg3zQ>