Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 May 2014 09:30:53 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Jonathan Anderson <jonathan.robert.anderson@gmail.com>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [GSoC] Machine readable output from userland utilities
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmomsA80Ggu6J7%2BXc-CY1i9N6zr9kim00gZOe1i6DFxuJiQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9D7D4A7D-31F0-45D8-8C16-977D4FA879D6@gmail.com>
References:  <49E9736E-AD14-4647-8B15-30603D01360C@mail.bg> <537F0DD9.6090805@highsecure.ru> <537F11A9.8020504@mu.org> <CAETOPp0k8kESHkYShksovDm04pm4as9DoAfCm2-ojJ3in=4hsw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomBDfePkKXMf_piG%2BhnhmwhhTREm5a5m2Qt=7U8E585Ww@mail.gmail.com> <9D7D4A7D-31F0-45D8-8C16-977D4FA879D6@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ayup.



-a

On 23 May 2014 09:11, Jonathan Anderson
<jonathan.robert.anderson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 May 2014, at 13:34, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> I'd actually prefer that some library API (like what's in libstatfoo)
> gets fleshed out to cover what hooks and options are required so you
> don't have to have the bikeshed argument of "what format." You only
> need to write some code to output it in the format you want.
>
> The UNIX way is tools, not policy. The library is a policy, sure, but
> it's a policy to let you define your own policies. It won't be locking
> anyone into anything like "json or bust."
>
> So how about the focus be on that, rather than trying to teach
> individual tools about individual encoding types?
>
>
> I think that's pretty much what the proposal says:
>
>> I'm planning to create a unified output abstraction in the form of a
>> library. The tools supporting the machine-readable output feature
>> will write output exclusively using the library. The exact output format
>> will be customizable. Several backend libraries (like libucl and libnv)
>> can be used to implement different formats.
>
> Am I perhaps misunderstanding you, and you're actually saying "let's not get
> distracted by bikesheds, the proposal is terrific as-is"?
>
>
> Jon
> --
> Jonathan Anderson
>
> jonathan@FreeBSD.org
> http://freebsd.org/~jonathan/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomsA80Ggu6J7%2BXc-CY1i9N6zr9kim00gZOe1i6DFxuJiQ>