Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:09:37 -0700
From:      Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
To:        Stefan Parvu <sparvu@systemdatarecorder.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: There is currently no usable release of FreeBSD.
Message-ID:  <CAOjFWZ7QPTA3BETcgniLB1Bi-jkYYqCoX3th12r9cpq7fJty%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140604233617.a97ffe3b3e04c6d8bbb2b4db@systemdatarecorder.org>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406040944570.2120@kozubik.com> <332D72DF-2225-40E2-B246-0786181AAB51@tony.li> <538F5FB5.9060008@FreeBSD.org> <20140604231432.a5581f5a50f8d7e1611f9736@systemdatarecorder.org> <538F7F10.7070605@freebsd.org> <20140604233617.a97ffe3b3e04c6d8bbb2b4db@systemdatarecorder.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 4, 2014 1:36 PM, "Stefan Parvu" <sparvu@systemdatarecorder.org>
wrote:
>
>
> > Technically, the branches are stable
>
> fair enough, but remember some people don't know what are FreeBSD branches
> nor the internal notation or the calling convention. They want to know
what can
> they download to use on their production environments. As well, probable
makes
> sense to have somewhere defined why there are 3 stable, production
releases
> and the life support scheme for each.

It is listed on the web site already, including dates. On my phone right
now, so can't easily post the link, but it's on the security section of the
site.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOjFWZ7QPTA3BETcgniLB1Bi-jkYYqCoX3th12r9cpq7fJty%2BQ>