Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:53:12 +0200 From: Olivier Mueller <om-lists-bsd@omx.ch> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell 1950 does not properly respond to reboot and shutdown -p Message-ID: <DA58CD15-0A28-40AB-8E00-3D0C04983D0C@omx.ch> In-Reply-To: <20061012110034.6826e298.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <200610101022.33761.jhb@freebsd.org> <200610101720.k9AHKdMI099668@ambrisko.com> <20061010145315.cefa9e19.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20061012144022.GV4945@poupinou.org> <20061012110034.6826e298.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 12 oct. 06 =E0 17:00, Bill Moran a =E9crit : > In response to Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org>: >> The device_printf() function take too much time I think, so you =20 >> get the same >> behaviour as the DELAY(). > > True. Problem is that I considered that possibility, and removed the > device_printf(), rebuild the kernel, and have been unable to reproduce > the problem with a stock SMP kernel since yesterday. > > I'm seriously considering the possibility that this has been fixed, =20= > but > I'm uncomfortable that nobody can say, "Sure, I committed a fix to =20 > that > last week." I would be happy to test & help, I also have a PE1950 around waiting for this problem to be solved to go in production. I would just need to =20 have the patch. (I'll check the list archive later, I just joined =20 freebsd-stable today) Btw, it would be nice if the patched if_bce.c could also be integrated into the cvs (http://yogurt.org/FreeBSD/if_bce.c). At the moment (beg. of the week) I still had to patch the source tree by hand to keep the =20= network interface working fine (cf. thread on freebsd-hardware). Regards, Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DA58CD15-0A28-40AB-8E00-3D0C04983D0C>