Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:39:12 +0200 From: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> To: "lev@freebsd.org" <lev@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Rebecca Cran <bcran@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: GPT boot has less features than legacy MBR-based one (Was: UEFI, loader.efi and /boot.config) Message-ID: <DE6A295D-80CF-4E9A-88EE-F9F63ED66286@me.com> In-Reply-To: <3f4214e2-36af-cc87-0a3c-2c7ce26cffd8@FreeBSD.org> References: <912985968.20190119125228@serebryakov.spb.ru> <etPan.5c433dd9.327b23c6.1973@bluestop.org> <1951151017.20190119235425@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4636753.YNO7O01DYZ@photon.int.bluestop.org> <17710465740.20190120134042@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CANCZdfq%2BmuSr=CX4V9_ebWwNv1S49=mJZms0ZVoCB2onp%2BqHNA@mail.gmail.com> <3f4214e2-36af-cc87-0a3c-2c7ce26cffd8@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 21 Jan 2019, at 14:15, Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > On 20.01.2019 20:05, Warner Losh wrote: > >> Is too complicated? Boot1.efi doesn't allow that, but loader.efi does. > loader.efi lives on ESP partition, do I understand it right? So, it > could not be damaged with "bad" upgrade? > > -- > // Lev Serebryakov > It could, unless the backup is created. rgds, toomas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DE6A295D-80CF-4E9A-88EE-F9F63ED66286>