Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 03 Aug 1997 15:07:40 +0100
From:      Ade Lovett <ade@demon.net>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@dk.tfs.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports-current/packages-current discontinued 
Message-ID:  <E0wv1Js-00008Z-00@genghis.eng.demon.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 03 Aug 1997 09:16:37 %2B0200." <2825.870592597@critter.dk.tfs.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>
>I wonder how many of you whould have written similar to
>argue against the inclusion of awk, sed, yacc, lex & csh,
>using the very same arguments, in earlier days of unix ?
>
>Tcl and perl represent a significant development in programming,
>and you guys argue that they should not be in our favourite 
>state-of-the-art UNIX ?

That's not what anyone is saying at all.   Of course perl and tcl
should be in our favorite Unix.  Just not as core components in
the same way that init, getty, sh are core components.

They should be handled as packages and ports (in a general sense),
outside of the core system that absolutely, positively, definitely
needs to be there to have any kind of runnable Unix system.

-aDe

-- 
Ade Lovett, Demon Internet Ltd.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wv1Js-00008Z-00>