Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:23:19 +0300
From:      =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Igor Shmukler=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= <shmukler@mail.ru>
To:        =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Robert Watson=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re[2]: realistic web benchmark
Message-ID:  <E1AnVcF-00095l-00.shmukler-mail-ru@f21.mail.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040201224057.45361C-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> &gt; I hope this is not entirely off topic. 
> &gt; 
> &gt; I am looking for some kind of realistic httpd performance benchmark.
> &gt; There are number of papers discussing how such benchmark could be
> &gt; constructed, but I was cusrious whether there is one available in a
> &gt; source form. 
> 
> In the past, I've used webstone for some web performance benchmarking. 
> Recently, we've also been contacted with regard to a test suite named Web
> Polygraph. 

I probably was not 100% clear when I asked the question. Sorry. I am looking for 
test that would tell me how will server perform in the field on WAN.

Webstone is a bit naive about benchmarking. It allows comparison of server  
scores, however the fact that a particular OS/server combination scores higher 
does not guaranatee that it will have higher thoughput in real life situation.

I scanned briefly through Web Polygraph's documentation and it seems like more 
powerful tool, but I could not find how to emulate large delays and packet loss 
common for WANs.

IS.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1AnVcF-00095l-00.shmukler-mail-ru>