Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Dec 2013 19:59:03 +0000
From:      Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
To:        Greg Rivers <gcr+freebsd-stable@tharned.org>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org, Michael Sinatra <michael@rancid.berkeley.edu>
Subject:   Re: BIND chroot environment in 10-RELEASE...gone?
Message-ID:  <E915D8A5-1CD0-465B-BAD1-59C45C9415F4@gid.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312041212000.2022@badger.tharned.org>
References:  <529D9CC5.8060709@rancid.berkeley.edu> <20131204095855.GY29825@droso.dk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312041212000.2022@badger.tharned.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On 4 Dec 2013, at 18:49, Greg Rivers <gcr+freebsd-stable@tharned.org> =
wrote:

> ... It's not a matter of BIND being more or less secure than other =
software, it's a matter of POLA and the huge duplicated efforts required =
by everyone going forward to either maintain their own chroot or migrate =
to the non-chroot installation. ...

Exactly. This is going to be a PITA.

--
Bob Bishop
rb@gid.co.uk







Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E915D8A5-1CD0-465B-BAD1-59C45C9415F4>