Date: Sun, 23 Apr 1995 20:50:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@haven.uniserve.com> To: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Re(2): IP problem with 950412-SNAP (and earlier -SNAPs) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950423204437.4581A-100000@haven.uniserve.com> In-Reply-To: <199504240051.TAA16133@bonkers.taronga.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Apr 1995, Peter da Silva wrote: > > or else the kernel restriction on routing to the local > > interface address needs to be relaxed (but what if you have multiple > > point-to-point links sharing the same address). > > How could you do that? Each interface needs to have a unique address. No it doesn't. I've run a SLIP interface and an ethernet interface on a FreeBSD machine both having the same address. I know that it is opinion of some that this shouldn't work, but ..... Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950423204437.4581A-100000>