Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 10:58:14 -0700 (MST) From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com> To: Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991125105436.21715A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.20.9911251001220.27351-100000@tricord.system.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > But I'd prefer having one or two development tracks (-stable,-current) > and not diverting into many directions, like Cisco does. > If you want to have ssh, you have to use 12.0(X)S release. > But you this may not support all your hardware, supported in 12.0(7)X-whatever. What I'd propose is one additional "track". Basically: -current (all the latest greatest experimental). -stable (all the latest gretest "Stable" stuff). -missioncritical (conservative release, once a year or so - only bug fixes after release). > If you'd rather stay with "General Deployment" - go with -stable. The problem is that -stable is not necessarily "General Deployment". The difference between -stable and "-missioncritical" would be that -stable gets new features - and -missioncritical gets more stable. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.991125105436.21715A-100000>