Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 14:00:24 -0500 (EST) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: Nick Hibma <hibma@skylink.it>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_bus.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.9912041353490.10542-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9912040939430.45014-100000@semuta.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > This is a ridiculous proposition, you wanting me to spend about 500 to > > 1000 Euro, just to make your life easier. If you can't fix typo's when > > No, I want folks be competent and responsible integrators. And I'll > back this with over 20 years experience in this area. I don't think anyone is against clean tree build testing; its the expectation that everyone should have to come up with the hardware to do their own testing in a reasonable amount of time. I'd submit that a set of central systems able to handle patch-sets in a batch manner would satisfy eveyone if turnaround could be delivered in a reasonable amount of time (say 2 to 4 hours?). Does someone want to get handy with perl, formail, and procmail and create such a beast? I'm fairly sure that the cvs commit checker could verify that the checkin had an approved MD5 signature. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | winter@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.9912041353490.10542-100000>