Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:40:30 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS SPS Perth <shocking@prth.pgs.com>, current@freebsd.org, poul@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another current crash (cvs-cur.6183 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003221239440.80766-100000@dt051n0b.san.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <29683.953706815@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> But it might actually make a lot of sense to make INVARIANTS the
> default this early in the -CURRENT cycle, protests ?
What kind of overhead does it add? The warning messages in LINT
look rather dire to me, but I'm interested in knowing the facts..
Doug
--
"While the future's there for anyone to change, still you know it seems,
it would be easier sometimes to change the past"
- Jackson Browne, "Fountain of Sorrow"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003221239440.80766-100000>