Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:46:49 +0200 (CEST)
From:      "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Some crucial questions about Linux vs. FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010191213480.11393-100000@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, maybe this is not of any interests for those who "fight for
FreeBSD", but it's an essential question to answer for me! I administer
now for about four years a small bunch of servers which represents the
backbone of our small institute and we are growing now. Because we are
in need of high performance machines on a cheap basis running 
parallel capable Fortran compilers we will go into some discussions
what to purchase and what kind of OS to use. Our focus is on Solaris x86
for educational institutions, Linux and FreeBSD. Most of the guys I
talked about only know Linux and Solaris x86 because wherever we hear
something about GUIs like X11 it is mentioned with Linux, if we read
articles in some German magazines we get informed that Linux is a way
to build up cheap and powerful internet firewalls - well, each aspect of
OpenSource software is discussed with Linux being mentioned! Now you
can imagine how hard it is to argue for FreeBSD and its benefits.

For about one month now I take tests on Fortran compilers and how they
work under FreeBSD/Linux emulation. Since March I take some tests on
a dual homed firewall based on FreeBSD and the experiences I made while 
doing this are not very positive, especially I got most explanations 
how things work (what is bridging, how it works, what is IP forwarding,
how it involves dual homed hosts and the IPFIREWALL facility etc.).
I'm not involved with kernel development so many things seems to be
secrets to me. I do not apply any kind of critical stuff here, I
offer some experiences. I still use FreeBSD and my experiences are
positive - regarding the system as itself. 
Well, to keep myself in shape and get informations about the weakness
and benefits of FBSD and Linux (pointing the recent STABLE versions 
of both systems) I ran into a black hole. I couldn't obtain any kind of
performance comparisons, especially for Fortran and numerical solutions.
I never found any comparisons of network performance and firewall
performance or a discussion about Linux's benefits against those
FreeBSD offers. 

What I need is a really objective discussion about performance benefits
of both systems, for instance how Linux deals with memory, how FBSD
deals with memory, a comparison of both systems performing SMP jobs,
how they deal with security aspects and good they will scale under 
heavy load. I found a very old comparison of the University of Karlsuhe,
they made some tests on FBSD 2.2 and a Red Hat Linux that was recent 
to that time and the result was that Linux had some (up to 40%)
performance losses when under heavy load while FreeBSD still performed
jobs smooth. But this was in 1997, I think. 

Concerning our wish of using a SMP machine with Fortran compilers I had
a discussion with some guys of our computer center. They all use Linux,
some student's pools are built up from Linux and a new SMP cluster
will be run by Linux. They all want Linux, they know Linux and they
have a lot of arguements for Linux. Linux is good, I do not doubt this
fact, but I have to find arguemnts for my local solution. One thing
that carved into my brain was the following statement of one of the
local scientists argueing for Linux:

"We were told that Linux performs best with up to four CPUs in comparison
to Solaris x86 (this was a statement from a SUN-employee). Solaris
performs better using more than 4 CPUs". Maybe you can understand 
that this is some arguement that could destroy all efforts in argueing for
FreeBSD as a reasonable platform ... :-(. And we all know that FreeBSD
(talking about version 4.1.1) has some disadvantages in comparison
to Linux while using this GIANT LOCK. 

So, it's hard to me to explain this problem exactly as it is in English, hope
someone could understand what I mean. I have to thank those who were able
to be brave and read this up to the end :-).
What I need is some kind of 
objective comparison (best on the same platform!) of performance of Linux
and FreeBSD. I need some objective performance discussions (well, please see
this like this: I'm not a kind of BSD developer, I'm a consumer in that way
and I need arguements to "resell" my decission using FreeBSD). 

If there is someone out here knowing some sites where we can look at 
performance tests, plese mail me! 

Thanks in advance,
Oliver

-
MfG 
O. Hartmann
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de

Klimadatenserver-Abteilung des IPA 
IT Netz- und Systembetreuung
Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
Becherweg 21
D-55099 Mainz
BRD/Germany

Tel: +496131/3924662
FAX: +496131/3923532



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010191213480.11393-100000>