Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 20:30:20 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysorg: sys/modules Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106152016001.83734-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpzobaiwqu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Jun 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Speaking of sysorg, sys/modules is a bleeding mess. I'd love to see I agree. It became worse recently when someone added the fs subdir. >... > - gather all vfs modules into sys/modules/fs (pseudofs and linprocfs > are already there, procfs will be there shortly) > > - gather all storage-related modules (RAID and SCSI controller > drivers, CAM, ccd, vinum etc.) into sys/modules/storage > > - gather all image activators and ABI compatibility modules into > sys/modules/compat > > - gather all the USB drivers into sys/modules/usb > > - put whatever's left into sys/modules/misc No thanks. > I know this means a lot of repo-copies, and it may not be worth the > hassle if the new kernel & module build system materializes in the > very near future, but at least some of this (the syscons module > sources) needs to move no matter what. It wouldn't be worth it even if it were right. Hopefully the new build system will put all the object files in the same directory, like they are for static kernel builds. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0106152016001.83734-100000>