Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:53:02 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, mark@grondar.za, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PAM pacthes we discuss Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201190950480.2065-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpu1ti6xp2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrey, The backing ou of a patch does not mean that it is wrong. It is a procedural step that ispart of the "re-evaluation" process for a patch that has become contested. It is important that we all follow this procedure so that we can go forward to teh next step, which is a technical discussion of the merrits of the change. On 19 Jan 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 18:33:02 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > > > > Could we arrange this without backing out? > > > No. > > Why? > > Andrey, this is very simple. You can either cooperate, in which case > we will allow you to explain what is wrong and participate in fixing > the problem in a manner that is satisfactory to us all; or you can > just walk away, and forfeit your vote in the matter. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0201190950480.2065-100000>