Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:20:47 +0100 (CET) From: Goran Gajic <ggajic@mail.sbb.co.yu> To: Peter Edwards <peadar.edwards@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_sk patch to get more info from people with problems Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.60.0411031105550.44515@mail.sbb.co.yu> In-Reply-To: <34cb7c840411030155710d8a26@mail.gmail.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.60.0411022245150.59594@mail.sbb.co.yu> <34cb7c840411030155710d8a26@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I was talking about your small patch. FreeBSD 5.3RC2-amd64 was working fine for some 18 h even with SMP compiled kernel until I have tried file copying over NFS (using linux 2.6.9 as NFS client). Performance was poor and after incomplite copy of single file system rebooted with panic. It was also strange that copying of 700mb took some 30 min. on 100Mbit/s FD. After that I have applied small two lines patch, recompiled kernel and although I have coppied something like 100Gb of different mp3 and avi files over NFS - so far everything seems ok. I haven't compiled kernel with options WITNESS but it was my intention and will do so if I experience any further (if any) sk driver caused suspected crashes. Regards, gg. On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Peter Edwards wrote: > Hi Goran: > Just to clarify: were you specifically talking about my (smaller) > patch? ie, the one that just added the two lock/unlock lines in > sk_jfree(), or John-Mark Gurney's one? > > Did you have witness/invariants compiled into your kernel? >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.60.0411031105550.44515>