Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Oct 1998 17:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
To:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Subject:   sleep() and Apache in release notes
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.02A.9810171705300.29127-100000@redfish>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(don't know who wrote what part of the release notes, but...)

It is somewhat disappointing to see:

o sleep(3) and usleep(3) are now implemented in terms of signanosleep(2)
  and now have correct SIGALRM interaction semantics and sleep(3) correctly
  returns the time remaining.  Some programs (notably apache httpd) bogusly
  depend on a sleep() "absorbing" a SIGALRM from a timer that expires during
  the life of the sleep.

in RELNOTES.TXT considering I have no idea where the bug in Apache that is
claiming would be and there have been no bug report or attempt to get this
fixed in Apache other than sticking lines in the release notes saying
"Apache is broken".

If there is a problem in Apache, please point it out so it can be fixed.  

-- 
     Marc Slemko     | Apache Group member
     marcs@znep.com  | marc@apache.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.02A.9810171705300.29127-100000>