Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 11:54:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> Cc: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>, Omachonu Ogali <oogali@intranova.net>, Brennan W Stehling <brennan@offwhite.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0 already? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0005141154380.18663-100000@rac2.wam.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <20000514141442.A18036@mithrandr.moria.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
neither would I, I'm just referring to the "official" statement. ================================================================= | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around. | | Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 | | and student at The | AIM: muythaibxr | | The University of Maryland, | Website: (Under Construction) | | College Park. | http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/| ================================================================= On Sun, 14 May 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Sun 2000-05-14 (01:27), Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > again, I also think 4.0 is very stable, but read the archives around the > > time 4.0 was released. Jordan said that it isn't to be considered > > "officially" stable until 4.1 > > And changed his mind when he noticed what the code freeze had led > towards. There are copious indications on the mailing lists referring > to his retraction of any statements about inherent instability in > dot-zero releases. He also said that we'd never have a release like 3.0 > again (amen to that!). > > 4.0 is considered the better choice. I wouldn't advise anyone to use > 3.4 over it, certainly. > > Neil > -- > Neil Blakey-Milner > Advocate In Chief, Sunesi Clinical Systems > nbm@mithrandr.moria.org > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.21.0005141154380.18663-100000>