Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:46:33 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch>
Cc:        rob@debank.tv, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 6.2-Release and Clamd 0.90 with libpthread.so
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0702201145420.12034@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070220174221.B4139@godot.imp.ch>
References:  <20070220153632.E4139@godot.imp.ch> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0702201138080.12034@sea.ntplx.net> <20070220174221.B4139@godot.imp.ch>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Martin Blapp wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
>> Probably because it's fork()ing and trying to call
>> non-async-signal-safe functions without doing an exec()?
>
> The strange thing is that I can't see any any fork() calls
> with libc_r or libthr. How's that possible ? Or do you think
> that its stuck at the beginning ? But why does it work then
> for some degree ?

I dunno, maybe ktrace was confused and it wasn't a fork()?

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0702201145420.12034>