Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 09:39:19 -0700 (PWT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: umm- ISP adapter feedback... Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9904120932460.23829-100000@feral-gw>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
One of you, I forgot whom, had the new XP1000 to play with- it had a new rev 'C' ISP1040 in it- I updated the driver to treat it like a ISP1040B and I'd like to know if it's been working okay. Secondly- I upped the queue limits again to 256- that used to give Doug's system agita. Let me know if it breaks again. The limit's going higher later- the 1080/1240 can take up to 1024 entries (I've done the 1080 support and the 1240 support is almost done and is in partial test at a place in England). I've also committed to using the FAST POST feature (commands that complete okay don't get a response updated in the response queue- instead the command handle is posted to mailbox registers and an async event interrupt is posted). Basically, if you see some breakage, let me know sooner rather than later. That goes for all on this list that use these adapters- I *know* that NCR is popular 'coz of price, but the driver sure seems iffy. I've been doing some work on a Solaris NCR driver (to add Ultra2 support) and while that driver is stunningly better than any other of the NCR drivers I've seen, it's *still* a mess. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.04.9904120932460.23829-100000>