Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:34:23 -0700 (MST) From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov> To: "Rouzer, Charles A (Chuck)" <car@vitalit.com> Cc: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sharing files within a cluster Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212101531170.1460-100000@carotid.ccs.lanl.gov> In-Reply-To: <003501c2a09b$5f5116c0$0301000a@LAPTOP>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Rouzer, Charles A (Chuck) wrote: > Lets not put Linux down like that. ;-)) I like "Linux is the new Unix." > better. ;-) I think FreeBSD would run all these Linux things just as well as Linux does. I sure wish somebody would look at bproc for FreeBSD. > GlobalFS for potential ports would be a good start. I don't know anyone who "GlobalFS" in general is bad. global anything is bad. Consider Private Name Spaces. > - Process migration, cluster wide /proc, GlobalFS or Other (ClusterFS?), no, please check out Plan 9, cluster-wide /proc is not a good thing. At most you want the bproc-style proc. Anything that involves global consensus is going to give you headaches. > - Scale to 100s of nodes. start at 1024. > - Cluster wide shared memory. eek. ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0212101531170.1460-100000>