Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:26:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Sujal Patel <smpatel@umiacs.umd.edu> To: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/bind - Imported sources Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960829162410.26532Q-100000@mickey.umiacs.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <199608292021.EAA02973@spinner.DIALix.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Aug 1996, Peter Wemm wrote: > Just a followup on what I said before.. I realise that just because the > tree layout isn't completely pure elsewhere doesn't make this "ok" > automatically. My defence was that I wasn't the first.. I understand that this particular case may not be "ok", but for other distributions like tcl that live in contrib, it would nice to have a symlink from /usr/src/usr.bin/tclsh (maybe). > No, symlinks dont come through CVS, so it'll have to be moved if that's > what is the right thing to do (which I'm happy to do). I know that they don't work with CVS, but perhaps there is something we can do to make the source tree that we send out with the distributions have the right symlinks? Maybe a "make src_links" in the makefile? Sujal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.91.960829162410.26532Q-100000>