Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 02:10:53 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net> Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.961018020355.25359C-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961017025714.16113R-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 Oct 1996, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > > I would be interested in the answer to this, I see the same behaviour on > a 2940/Quantum Atlas combo, although the numbers are quite a bit higher. > :) > > In any case, given specifically the issue of news, where most activity is > reading, this is disturbing. IOZONE isn't the benchmark to use to determine news performance. FFS and the file buffering used aren't optimized for reading large files. Regards, Mike Hancock
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.961018020355.25359C-100000>