Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:09:48 +0200 From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) To: chrcoluk@gmail.com (Chris), ports@freebsd.org, ports-secteam@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release Message-ID: <X7caW0vTrN@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <CAOhm=5pPvKeJV5VHkdnDj=5nE73mH=gv7Z=240bfG6AwKzKvOg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I am excited about opensl 1.1 but I am not sure if it is right to just > jump the security/openssl port to it, maybe make a new > security/openssl11 port? > > Or move the default port but add a new security/openssl10 port for 1.0.2. this would only increase the mess we have, and create only more conflicts between libssl.so versions. We have done this for openssl 0.9x before, not with good results. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?X7caW0vTrN>