Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:44:56 -0800 (PST)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Cc:        tanimura@freebsd.org, dillon@freebsd.org, smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: fd locking.
Message-ID:  <XFMail.020112174456.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020112173038.H7984@elvis.mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 13-Jan-02 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> [020112 03:11] wrote:
>> I've got world building with these patches.
>> 
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/fd.diff
>> 
>> or
>> 
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/fd.diff.gz
> 
> I've been asked for an archetectural overview.

One cosmetic tweak:

> void  fhold(struct file *fp);
>       /* increments reference count on a file */
> 
> void  fhold_locked(struct file *fp);
>       /* like fhold but expects file to locked */

Could you change these to return a reference to the fp like crhold()?

Thus you end up with code like

newfp = fhold(oldfp) which reads better and documents what the old
and new references are.  It's actually a Terry suggestion. :)

Other than that it sounds good.  I'm looking over the patch atm and
will get back to you if I have any questions.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.020112174456.jhb>