Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 09:42:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicole <freelist@webweaver.net> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Jim Van Baalen <vansax@mail.websidestory.com> Subject: Re: Appropriate 100bt NIC for NFS Message-ID: <XFMail.980506094232.freelist@webweaver.net> In-Reply-To: <19980506100349.A8349@emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06-May-98 Dan Nelson wisely wrote:
> We've been using the Intel EtherExpress Pro/100+ cards exclusively here
> in clients and servers for the last year or so, with excellent results.
> The 3com cards just became too much trouble to keep working (they
> wouldn't even probe on some of our machines, Novell's Client32 wouldn't
> work with the newer cards, etc etc).
>
> Dan Nelson
> dnelson@emsphone.com
>
Hi Dan
I have a post that is similiar, except that I AM using the intel 10/100 cards.
The only way I could get my NFS mount to work under any sort of load was to use
the mount hack of dropping the mtu size to under 1500.
The machines are PentII 333 with an Abit MB adaptec SCSI and 2 Nic cards.
Any clues as to what to look for to get rid of the hack would be great.
Thanks
Nicole
nicole@webweaver.net - http://www.webweaver.net/
webmistress@dangermouse.org - http://www.dangermouse.org/
-------------------------------------------------
-- Powered by Coka Cola and FreeBSD --
-- Stong enough for a man - But made for a Woman --
-- Microsoft: What bug would you like today? --
-- I tried an internal modem once, but it hurt when I walked --
---------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.980506094232.freelist>