Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:03:26 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upstream for contrib/tzcode/stdtme? Message-ID: <abce970e-af0b-3f7b-3fcd-a77b5e7a1b50@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <C8E09003-E15D-4D68-B783-B0FD435454D0@freebsd.org> References: <CAF6rxg=rYVizBPFxxEr4M6uUymhAUq6qHgj-3N6uTubsTBO6pg@mail.gmail.com> <C8E09003-E15D-4D68-B783-B0FD435454D0@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/15/18 7:28 AM, Philip Paeps wrote: > On 2018-06-10 21:40:21 (+0200), Eitan Adler wrote: >> What's the upstream for contrib/tzcode/stdtme? > > https://www.iana.org/time-zones (and https://github.com/eggert/tz). > >> There are a couple of PRs for it and I'd like to either update, fix >> upstream, or move to non-contrib & fix. > > I've started updating it several times but the rather awkward layout of > the vendor tree makes doing just about anything else more attractive. :) > > More than happy to review an update if you actually manage to complete > one! > > I wonder if we should just make the "moving around files" in the vendor > tree go away... I do think we should perhaps import the vendor tree to contrib/stdtime or some such and then apply our local patches from libc to there. Alternatively, we could move the the files from libc into suitable locations in contrib/stdtime and then do an 'svn merge --record-only' to bootstrap the vendor mergeinfo for the current version and use that as a basis for updating? -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?abce970e-af0b-3f7b-3fcd-a77b5e7a1b50>