Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:18:06 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> Cc: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best archiver? (for music) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903150516360.38979@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090315035101.GA28705@thought.org> References: <20090313191520.GA14233@thought.org> <20090313202226.GA47453@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903132128460.33043@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090314030558.GB25027@thought.org> <20090314072602.GA75036@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090315035101.GA28705@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> listened-to (kttsd) the man lame. Then surfed around; then came > back to the man page and read the several examples. So: the idea > is that lame ["just"] converts WAV files to mp3. There is a as every good unix tool - it does exactly what is supposed to do. nobody forbids you to make your script that do what you want with lame and say cdda2wav > Given the availability of compression these days, it makes me > wonder why telephone conversations still sound so 'tinny'. But > then, that's another matter. > with right configured speex codec phone talks sounds actually better than uncompressed :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903150516360.38979>