Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 20:03:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra> References: <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW%2B4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the >> feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first >> I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will >> gonna be the differentiator. > > The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do is ZFS supposed to be faster at all? really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918>