Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Sep 2014 16:16:10 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To:        Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: /etc/motd summary
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.11.1409081609310.43238@wonkity.com>
In-Reply-To: <540E2410.30404@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.11.1409081223060.15689@wonkity.com> <540E18ED.1070003@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1409081519070.43238@wonkity.com> <540E2410.30404@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Bryan Drewery wrote:

> I understand what you're saying, although I've never had someone
> complain to me that they ran 'cmd' literally.

We've had users in the forums type literal strings including the 
prompts.

> On the other hand, the spaces are very unclear that it is even a command
> that can be ran in 'man man' and 'man hier' uses.
>
> The old motd has `cmd' syntax.

Yes...

Okay, another slight variation:
http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/motd/motd.vertical



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1409081609310.43238>