Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:02:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Roderick <hruodr@gmail.com> To: Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org> Cc: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sendmail Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1907011156350.1062@fbsd.local> In-Reply-To: <A3CEF82D-B71D-4B4F-87AD-E3408559DE26@boosten.org> References: <CAL2OhpoSxnK2Uy_OKxqnWyXuqg=tNBm6wy2r1%2BukVWwPnPrj0g@mail.gmail.com> <20190630092535.7913d305.freebsd@edvax.de> <D25B22FD-2164-4281-AE21-9C5FD188AA38@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1907010639210.1006@fbsd.local> <A3CEF82D-B71D-4B4F-87AD-E3408559DE26@boosten.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Peter Boosten via freebsd-questions wrote: > _and_ that sendmail is based on a single executable, while other MTAs > spread the tasks over several. Is that really so bad? Why people do not hammer exim, the standard MTA in debian, for the same reason? Does it have advantages that neutralizes it? I tried a little exim, a little postfix and used at the end sendmail. I googled to find differences in order to decide, but I did not find anything that helped much to take a decision. Rod.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1907011156350.1062>