Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:01:41 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?B?SXN0duFu?= <leccine@gmail.com>
To:        Invernizzi Fabrizio <fabrizio.invernizzi@telecomitalia.it>
Cc:        "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com>
Subject:   Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
Message-ID:  <b8592ed80908030301u453b4bd9yc111bd28339e609d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <36A93B31228D3B49B691AD31652BCAE9A4560DF947@GRFMBX702BA020.griffon.local>
References:  <36A93B31228D3B49B691AD31652BCAE9A4560DF911@GRFMBX702BA020.griffon.local> <0E567C7E-4EAA-4B89-9A8D-FD0450D32ED7@moneybookers.com> <36A93B31228D3B49B691AD31652BCAE9A4560DF947@GRFMBX702BA020.griffon.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
what about your sysctls?
I would like to see what have you done yet.

Here is a previous conversation about that:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-performance@freebsd.org/msg02293.html

<http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-performance@freebsd.org/msg02293.html>=
Actually
I am not aware of the changes in 7.2 or what could be the best value set fo=
r
you, worth to try to fine tune these.

Regards,
Istvan

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Invernizzi Fabrizio <
fabrizio.invernizzi@telecomitalia.it> wrote:

> Hi
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stefan Lambrev [mailto:stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com]
> > Sent: luned=EC 3 agosto 2009 11.22
> > To: Invernizzi Fabrizio
> > Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The limitation that you see is about the max number of packets that
> > FreeBSD can handle - it looks like your best performance is reached at
> > 64 byte packets?
>
> If you are meaning in term of Packet per second, you are right. These are
> the packet per second measured during tests:
>
> 64 byte:        610119 Pps
> 512 byte:       516917 Pps
> 1492 byte:      464962 Pps
>
>
> > Am I correct that the maximum you can reach is around 639,000 packets
> > per second?
>
> Yes, as you can see the maximum is 610119 Pps.
> Where does this limit come from?
>
> > Also you are not routing the traffic, but instead the server handles
> > the requests itself and eat CPU to reply?
>
> Correct. In these first tests I want to "tune" the system, so I am using
> the (let me say) worst scenario.
>
>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-
> > unsubscribe@freebsd.org
> > > "
> >
> > --
> > Best Wishes,
> > Stefan Lambrev
> > ICQ# 24134177
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle
> persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante
> dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualo=
ra
> abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati d=
i
> darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua
> distruzione, Grazie.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privilege=
d
> information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying,
> printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the inten=
ded
> recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the
> sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



--=20
the sun shines for all



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b8592ed80908030301u453b4bd9yc111bd28339e609d>