Date: 17 Jan 2001 01:44:32 +0100 From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG, will@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: how to tag ports before doing major changes and suggestion ... Message-ID: <bst7qa6n.fsf@gits.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Andreas Klemm's message of "Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:33:56 %2B0100" References: <20010116133356.A26389@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > While I'm at it ... > I noticed, that some people use new naming conventions for > patches, by using descriptive names instead of the patch-xy > scheme. as I remember. Will Andrew (CC:) began to do that some time ago. no sure about a consensus about his point of view. > How's the motivation to change existing port to that new scheme ? > Does the port maintainer simply move the file within the repository > or do I have to delete and add the patch under the new name ??? if a patch-xx is applicable (even if updates are needed), left him like this. new patches-xx may have new-names. > Then I'd like to suggest, to offer a ASCII version of the > complete porters handbook ... what about : cd /usr/doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/books/porters-handbook make PRINTERDEVICE=txt.gz Cyrille. -- home: mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bst7qa6n.fsf>