Date: 11 Dec 2000 23:58:32 +0100 From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net> To: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.runet.edu> Cc: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: latex2e vs. teTeX (was Re: ports/23355: ports/latex2html upgrader to 99.2b8) Message-ID: <bsuilg4n.fsf@gits.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Brett Taylor's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:22:29 -0500 (EST)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012111116140.76254-100000@peloton.runet.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.runet.edu> writes:
> I've looked over the changes - and made some minor changes of my own.
>
> - switched the two dependencies (latex/dvips) to teTeX as it
> covers both of those
what is the rule about tex/latex2e vs. teTeX ?
awk -F\| '$8~/.../{print $1}' INDEX | wc
tex- 12
build latex2 5
teTeX 13
awk -F\| '$9~/.../{print $1}' INDEX | wc
tex- 28
run latex2 7
teTeX 24
so, some ports need tex/latex2e while some others need teTeX.
maybe a choice has to be done between both, no ?
> Below is my diff of the files - it mostly matches with what Cyrille did,
> other than the above. Thanks to Cyrille for cleaning up this port nicely.
> :-)
thanks ;^)
CC: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Cyrille.
--
home: mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bsuilg4n.fsf>