Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 01:11:15 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing Message-ID: <cb5206420705121411u21df3e48x83a7fe81ea8fedbd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070512210454.GA28045@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070510212817.GA67897@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070512153043.GA12201@graf.pompo.net> <cb5206420705121400j7600519ara3f239e1149053ee@mail.gmail.com> <20070512210454.GA28045@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/13/07, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:00:51AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > Reporting success on one of my desktops. It's a current/i386 > > box with a little over 1000 packages (after the upgrade). > > > > I used portupgrade-devel, but started with stale INDEX. For > > this reason or not, I stumbled upon the libXft quirk. Stopped > > the upgrade when I saw a few pkg_create's to take far too > > long because of dependency loop, rebuilt the INDEX with > > "make index" (portsdb -U didn't work for me), ran pkgdb -F > > and after that portupgrade -a finished without any major > > surprises. > > Can you confirm that you started by doing portupgrade -Rf libXft and > it still gave the dependency loop? Nope, I actually misread UPDATING and thought portupgrade-devel didn't need it. [ try s/nor/not/ in the message :) ] > > mergebase.sh failed, probably because my system is quite > > dirty. Even after I removed the conflicting files, it just > > failed. I've made the merge myself and been living happily > > ever since (so far). > > Hmm, would be nice to know why. I'll try to look closer at it on my laptop. Something tells me it'll fail there too, because it's my development system and it's as dirty as it gets.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420705121411u21df3e48x83a7fe81ea8fedbd>