Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:18:27 +0200 From: "Vlad K." <vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should a package restart on upgrade itself Message-ID: <d46702179b05cce242150dc5371e8b04@acheronmedia.com> In-Reply-To: <5952AE26.6090504@quip.cz> References: <b71469f3-dd9d-6680-f85e-a7acfcf9d944@fechner.net> <20170627163502.u2m4trqccbkri63j@ivaldir.net> <4aad148bce4cfc626dea0d31bd62be41@acheronmedia.com> <fe46c8ee-7d56-23ce-273b-4205e6183c0e@fechner.net> <77b3c4e0b39e561fc808ce42c7983c2c@acheronmedia.com> <5952AE26.6090504@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2017-06-27 21:12, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > And this is another problem. Poudriere always rebuild whole dependency > chain but if package version stays the same then pkg upgrade will not > upgrade all packages in chain but just the one with different version > number. Which is my point. pkg might not upgrade postgresql96-server because the version of THAT package didn't change, but you'll see in the output of Poudriere bulk that postgresql96-server was rebuilt because, say, libxml was updated or rebuilt because, in turn, some of its own dependency updated. That's why Poudriere's bulk output is the best list to check what you might want to restart, IMHO. -- Vlad K.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d46702179b05cce242150dc5371e8b04>