Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:12:45 +0700 From: "Nick Pavlica" <linicks@gmail.com> To: "Mike Tancsa" <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Subject: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch Message-ID: <dc9ba0440611251112h52ec543av6f54166fea0a05ff@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200611231652.kANGqJsr005016@lava.sentex.ca> References: <4557CECD.2000609@samsco.org> <200611130454.kAD4sZwe041556@lava.sentex.ca> <4557FF7A.8020704@samsco.org> <200611132054.kADKsFvK045726@lava.sentex.ca> <4558E3DC.6080800@samsco.org> <200611200454.kAK4sdat083568@lava.sentex.ca> <7.1.0.9.0.20061120160757.14d4a728@sentex.net> <200611220247.kAM2l9JP095066@lava.sentex.ca> <20061122130947.GM20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200611231652.kANGqJsr005016@lava.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I might give OpenBSD a quick try as a reference. Mike, Have you done any testing on Solaris 10, or OpenSolaris? I understand that it has a very robust IP stack. It would be interesting to see how the three stack up against each other (FBSD, LINUS, SunOS). --Nick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dc9ba0440611251112h52ec543av6f54166fea0a05ff>