Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:26:41 +0100 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git tools for building in base? Message-ID: <e3dce606-1a28-886f-b481-7f1d224d82cc@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <10f7b800-b015-2a80-b741-4f7db03bf6eb@quip.cz> References: <X714z7pMgNOFaTIc@rpi4.local> <20201125055425.01AA628417@elsa.codelab.cz> <10f7b800-b015-2a80-b741-4f7db03bf6eb@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18/12/20 14:02, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: > >> NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from >> cvs to hg (Mercurial). > > Do anybody have a link to some documents stating why FreeBSD chose Git > and why NetBSD chose Mercurial? I am using both tools at $WORK, I am > just curious what leads to these decisions. > This is a draft document discussing exactly this (I'm not the author, imp was) https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/git-why.md -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e3dce606-1a28-886f-b481-7f1d224d82cc>