Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 17:29:06 +1000 From: Richard Jones <richard@a42.deep-thought.org> To: Reinier Bezuidenhout <rbezuide@oskar.nanoteq.co.za> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD TCP stack SUX big juicy ones. Message-ID: <m0xGJDX-0024w4C@a42.deep-thought.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 01 Oct 1997 08:33:36 %2B0200." <199710010633.IAA00705@oskar.nanoteq.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Reinier Bezuidenhout <rbezuide@oskar.nanoteq.co.za> writes: > Greetings good and humble user ... > > > was not technical enough for the hackers@freebsd.org list and got lost > > amongst techno-gems such as "Our *NIX is better than their *NIX" and > > "The number of the beast is vi vi vi". Now as important as these issues are I > It would not amaze me if you didn't get any answer with this e-mail ... > well be amazed. Your reply is one more than I received with a serious subject header. Do people here hit <d> for all messages that don't contain the words "linux" or "plug and play" coz my short 72 hours on the list seem to indicate this to be so? > So .. sorry .. I don't have a technical answer for you, > explaining what happens, but maybe it's the attitude of you > TCP/IP stack that's the problem :) > You are probably right, my TCP/IP stack has been more than a little ornery of late. Me and the rest of the kernel have been talking to it regarding the shocking attitude problem exhibited recently. The damn thing just has no respect for authority. Anyways someone should give it a good talking to before it starts leading to faceless DoS attacks. > But like I know the guys at FreeBSD ... they probably won't > get offended by this and reply anyway :) Or maybe the guys at FreeBSD who can answer the question don't even read this list coz of the low SNR. oh well.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0xGJDX-0024w4C>