Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 May 2000 09:23:33 -0500
From:      hawk2@hawkins.cba.uni.edu
To:        Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: better than pine? 
Message-ID:  <m12sRD5-0010dLC@hawkins.cba.uni.edu>
In-Reply-To: Message from Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk>  of "Thu, 18 May 2000 10:30:04 BST." <20000518103004.J21557@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> 
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.10005162201530.75114-100000@home.offwhite.net> <200005171727.KAA09714@cortex.NSMA.Arizona.EDU> <20000517202936.H21557@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20000518024350.F16497@physics.iisc.ernet.in>  <20000518103004.J21557@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ben belabored,

> Good work to the Pine team then, three things which do NOT belong in
> a MUA.  HTML parsing code belongs in a web browser,

Oh, a little bit belongs in the MUA:  enough to automatically send a
"You clueless moron" message to the idiot that sent a message in html :)

then again, I'm quite happy with mh from the command line . . . 




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m12sRD5-0010dLC>