Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:34:35 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port system "problems" Message-ID: <op.wgilfxbv34t2sn@tech304> In-Reply-To: <4FE9817C.7020905@netfence.it> References: <4FE8E4A4.9070507@gmail.com> <20120626065732.GH41054@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120626092645.Horde.HytQbVNNcXdP6WQ1aMtjoMA@webmail.df.eu> <4FE96BA0.6040005@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4FE97008.2060501@netfence.it> <4FE97AE1.9080109@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4FE9817C.7020905@netfence.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:31:40 -0500, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote: > > The "effort" will be 3x processing time for portupgrade (or whatever) to > update the package database 3 times as much as before. pkgng uses sqlite. Please provide proof that it is as slow or slower than our current package database is.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wgilfxbv34t2sn>