Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:55:09 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, "Talbot, Paul" <paul.talbot@eds.com> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portversion/portupgrade Message-ID: <p05210608bafae02394b7@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20030528214711.GA94049@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <F455E4114C4AD211BCDF00805F31BCF312B27EE3@USSAM203> <20030528214711.GA94049@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2:47 PM -0700 5/28/03, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, May 28, 2003, Talbot, Paul wrote: > > >> Hello all... >> > > I have an issue with portversion and portupgrade (20030427) on > > my Ultra 10.... > > > > After running the 'portsdb -Uu' command, I get the following > > output from portversion and portupgrade: > > >> localhost# portversion >> ** No package matching '*' was found. >> localhost# >> >> localhost# portupgrade -a >> ** No such package '*' is installed. >> localhost# > >Yes, this is known to be broken. knu is aware of it, but seems >to be too busy to fix it. If there are any other ruby hackers >out there who are familiar with the ruby internals, fixing this >would be a great help. Do you know if this a bug in ruby itself, or is it only in portversion && portupgrade? Is it only happening on sparc64? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05210608bafae02394b7>