Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:17:43 +0200 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf for a poudriere jail and CPUTYPE Message-ID: <r240-cxo8-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20190928135343.GE49516@bastion.zyxst.net> (tech-lists@zyxst.net's message of "Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:53:43 %2B0100") References: <20190928135343.GE49516@bastion.zyxst.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> writes: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:33:36PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> If I'm building ports on a poudriere and the jail I'm building for has say >> Host CPU: btver1 and the host running poudriere is Host CPU: sandybridge, is >> there any benefit or advantage in defining CPUTYPE?= in the jail's make.conf? >> >> If yes, which programs does it benefit? I guess maybe openssl > > thought I'd experiment. Seems setting CPUTYPE?=btver1 causes some ports to > fail at the configure or build stage. python36 and lzo2 for example. Unsure > why that should be (or where to ask???) I can't reproduce. Provide poudriere log which documents FreeBSD version, compiler type/version/flags, port options, make.conf, etc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?r240-cxo8-wny>