Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:43:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Tuomo Valkonen <tuomov@iki.fi> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ion3 removal (Re: Ion3 license violation) Message-ID: <slrnfm1ol8.mqu.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> References: <20071212213200.D576216A469@hub.freebsd.org> <200712121701.57460.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20071212183542.f9bf5e55.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200712121930.46708.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20071213021217.GA3535@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-12-13, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > Further, note that my initial commit tried to do this, and I asked the > author if it was acceptable. It was clear from his reply that it was > not -- especially considering the following history: It seemed acceptable wrt. the source package; I was querying the effect on binary packages. Also read again what I have written about the Xinerama module. Why is it not a separate package? What is it disguised as part of Ion, when it is not? -- Tuomo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnfm1ol8.mqu.tuomov>