Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:38:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon Message-ID: <slrni8c5gj.1eap.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> References: <201009011653.o81Grkm4056064@fire.js.berklix.net> <201009011902.06538.hselasky@c2i.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009051144190.47367@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Robert Watson! On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 11:47:29 +0100 (BST); Robert Watson wrote about 'Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon': >>> It seems code exists :-) >>> >>> http://old.nabble.com/ISDN4BSD-on-8-current-td23919925.html >>> ISDN4BSD package has been updated to compile on FreeBSD >>> 8-current >>> >>> http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/isdn4bsd/ >>> >>> Apparently needs massaging into main FreeBSD tree. >> >> I agree that my I4B code should be re-written somewhat before committed. >> Possibly we should update the API's present too, to support IP-telephony >> aswell. > Just to clarify things a little for those following it: the original I4B code > was removed for entirely practical reasons: it couldn't run without the Giant > lock, and support for the Giant lock over the network stack was removed. But if it was used, removing a component just because of Giant lock is not practical and is purely ideologic, isn't it? -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrni8c5gj.1eap.vadim_nuclight>