Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 16:43:25 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Looking for advice on lpr/lpd changes Message-ID: <v04210114b540ca2b4b69@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20000510121459.B4589@Hamilton-ppp44812.sympatico.ca> References: <v0421010bb53f1baa2310@[128.113.24.47]> <20000510121459.B4589@Hamilton-ppp44812.sympatico.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:14 PM -0400 5/10/00, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: >On Wed, May 10, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > > 1990's) with the extra features we've added. Once I have > > things sorted out, I'll have a number of updates to offer. > >Cool! > > > [...] > >If you are hoping to have a serious discussion, a carefully >written message to the -arch list may work. The -arch list >is meant to be a low(er)-volume, higher information-density >list for discussing architectural changes. Hmm. I always assumed that was for "big freebsd architectural changes", as opposed to changes to a "little program" like lpr. I'll follow it for awhile and get a better feeling for it. I would like to find whichever people are particularly interested in lpr/lpd changes, without distracting those people who really don't care much about printing at all. >Finished patches are best sent via send-pr(1) where they >will eventually be addressed (although the response-time >for send-pr(1) is regrettably long...) I have already noticed that send-pr patches are sometimes committed almost instantly, and other times it's like pulling teeth to get some attention for them... --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04210114b540ca2b4b69>