Date: 22 Mar 2000 12:36:36 -0800 From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature request: Store dist file size somewhere Message-ID: <vqcr9d2spwr.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Nik Clayton's message of "Wed, 22 Mar 2000 20:15:03 %2B0000" References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003211840440.84343-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <vqcln3bu2hw.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000322084226.A70194@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <vqc4s9yu6xx.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000322201502.A43966@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> * Ah ha. That's more like it. Of course: * * % make check-size * foo-1.2 369,638 * bar-3.0 27,224 * baz-0.8 1,228,846 * * Total: 1,625,708 * * might have prevented the mind numbing tedium of downloading linux_base * over a 33.6 connection :-) Sure, we can add something like that too. * Is files/md5 the best place to put it? I was thinking something like * files/size, which would either be * * 1. The total size of all the distfiles that make up the port, or * * 2. The size of all the distfiles (distfile\tsize or similar) * * That way you don't need to do anything to md5(1). Err, before Richard has a heart attack. files/md5 *is* the right place to put these stuff. If we add another file, that's 3,000 more small files, meaning 3,000 more i-nodes and 3,000 more disk fragments in the ports tree. We don't need to do anything to md5(1). The size can be calculated without using md5 (think "ls" :). Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcr9d2spwr.fsf>