Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 00:54:43 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> Cc: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>, standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: C99 floating point macros Message-ID: <xzpadh5qabg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030209003350.GA20683@HAL9000.homeunix.com> (David Schultz's message of "Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:33:50 -0800") References: <20030207194848.N353@leelou.in.tern> <20030208112619.GA15718@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030208130529.C355@leelou.in.tern> <20030209003350.GA20683@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> writes: > Hmm...why not just use some macros, like this? Macros behave strangely when invoked with arguments which have side effects. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpadh5qabg.fsf>