Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:27:07 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Lanny Baron <lnb@FreeBSDsystems.COM> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ata0-raid oddness. Message-ID: <xzpbrous0tw.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <40119E16.1010802@FreeBSDsystems.COM> (Lanny Baron's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:20:06 -0500") References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0401231406000.41030-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <40119E16.1010802@FreeBSDsystems.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lanny Baron <lnb@FreeBSDsystems.COM> writes: > That is correct. ad0 and ad1 are subdisks of respective ar* it is *not* correct - ad0 and ad1 should not be shown when they are members of an active array, as any attempt to partition and label them directly is likely to corrupt the array. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpbrous0tw.fsf>